Course syllabus

Course Description

This course will look at some theoretical issues that lie behind applied and professional ethics. We will begin with some issues in the theory of applied ethics – whether practical moral expertise is possible and the role of principles in applied ethics - before turning to professional ethics. In the professional ethics we will look at issues including the idea of role-differentiated ethics (the idea that moral obligations might attach to roles rather than to individuals); the relation between applied and professional ethics and normative moral theory, (consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics); and the concept of integrity as it applied in professional and applied contexts. The professional ethics part of the course will use my book The Counsel of Rogues: A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer’s Role (Ashgate, 2009; Routledge, 2016) as a framework. That book focuses on law and lawyers, but we will following up relevant themes and issues as they apply more broadly to applied and professional ethics, asking, for instance whether the model I defend with respect to lawyers is relevant to other professions. We will also explore issues which the account raises, such as the idea of moral expertise.

Reading Material

Links to the readings - including the recommended text - are provided through the Canvas 'Reading Lists' tab.  Additional material will be provided though Canvas.

Recommended Text

Tim Dare The Counsel of Rogues: A Defence of the Standard Conception of the Lawyer’s Role (Ashgate, 2009; Routledge, 2016)

Assessment, Coursework and Final Examination:

Coursework for this paper consists of one essay of about 3000 words and four 250 word summaries of topics covered in the discussion hour.  The 250 word summaries are due within seven days of the discussion hour at which the topic you are writing on was discussed. (There will be eleven discussion hour meetings (Thursday 3-4, room 206-302). Participation in the discussion hours is recommended but not compulsory.  They will begin in week 2).  

There will be a two-hour final examination.

Your final mark will be the sum of 50% of your mark on the final examination, 40% of your essay mark, and 10% of your mark for the four short summaries of discussion topics.

Essays:

You must submit your essays electronically through Turnitin.  You are not required to submit a hard copy.

Essays are due on Friday September 22.

 Essay Topics:

1. Present and discuss the idea of practical moral expertise.

2. Present and discuss at least one significant challenge to applied ethics.

3. Present and discuss the role of principles in reasoning in applied ethics.

4. Present and discuss the idea of role-differentiated obligation.

 Lectures

Week 1: July 14, Lecture Tuesday July 25.

Introduction & Challenges to Applied Ethics

Reading:

Tim Dare, ‘Challenges to Applied Ethics’, Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (Second Edition) 2012, Pages 167–173 https://doi-org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/10.1016/B978-0-12-373932-2.00015-6

Week 2: July 31, Lecture Tuesday August 1.

The Idea of Moral Expertise

Readings:  

HL Dreyfus and SE Dreyfus, ‘What is Moral Maturity? A Phenomenological Account of the Development of Ethical Expertise’ in Universalism and Communitarianism ed. D Rasmussen (MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1990) 237-264 ISBN 0262181401

Tim Dare, The Counsel of Rogues, pp. 103-106

Jan Crosthwaite ‘The Nature of Ethical Expertise: A Problem in the Professional Ethics of Professional Ethicists’ (1995) 9 Bioethics 361-379 ISSN 0269-9702

Scot D. Yoder 'The Nature of Ethical Expertise' The Hastings Center Report Vol. 28, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec., 1998), pp. 11-19

Dreyfus Powerpoint

Week 3: August 7, Lecture Tuesday August 8.

Principles and Applied Ethics

Readings:

Alastair McIntyre ‘Does Applied Ethics rest on a mistake?’ (1984) 67 Monist 498-513

Henry S. Richardson ‘Specifying, Balancing, and Interpreting Bioethical; Principles’ (2000) 25 Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 285-307 ISSN 0360-5310

Bernard Gert, Charles M Culver, and K Danner Clouser ‘Common Morality versus Specified Principlism: Reply to Richardson’ (2000) 25 Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 308-322 ISSN 0360-5310

Principles Powerpoint

Week 4: August 14, Lecture Tuesday August 15.

Professional Ethics: An example - The Standard Conception of the Lawyer’s Role

Reading:  

Tim Dare, The Counsel of Rogues, pp.1-29

Roles - Lawyer example Powerpoint

Week 5: August 21, Lecture Tuesday August 22.

The Idea of Role Obligation

Reading 

Alan Gerwith ‘Professional Ethics: the Separatist Thesis’ (1986) 96 Ethics pp. 282-300

Michael Hardiman 'Role Obligations' (1994) 91 Journal of Philosophy pp.-363 ISSN 0022-362X

Judith Andre ‘Role Morality as a Complex Instance of Ordinary Morality American Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 28, No. 1 (Jan., 1991), pp. 73-80 http://www.jstor.org/stable/20014357

Tim Dare 'Robust Role Obligation: How to Roles make a moral difference?The Journal of Value Inquiry, 2016, Vol.50(4), pp.703-719

Powerpoint: The Idea  of Role Obligation

Week 6: August 28, Lecture Tuesday August 29.

Role Differentiation Continued

Reading:  

Tim Dare, The Counsel of Rogues, pp.29-57

David Luban Lawyers and Justice (Princeton; Princeton University Press, 1988), Chapter 7 ‘The structure of role morality’ pp.128-147 ISBN 0691077843

John Rawls 'Two Concepts of Rules' (1955) 64 Philosophical Review 3-32 ISSN 0031-8108

Arthur Applbaum ‘Are Lawyers Liars? The Argument of Redescription’ (1998) 4 Legal Theory 63 ISSN 1352-3252

Mid Semester Break: Saturday September 2 – Sunday September 16.

Week 7: September 18, Lecture Tuesday September 19.

 Integrity and Detachment

Can professionals maintain personal integrity while also giving proper respect to the demands of professional roles?  Is integrity a 'substantive' moral concept, such that one has it only if one is a good person, or a formal concept requiring only that one's preferences and dispositions are coherent in some sense?  

Powerpoint: Distance, Detachment and Integrity

Required Reading:

Cox, Damian, Marguerite La Caze and Michael Levine ‘Integrity’ (2005) Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy (online) ed. Edward Zalta

Tim Dare The Counsel of Rogues Chapter 7, ‘Distance, Detachment and Integrity

Cheshire Calhoun ‘Standing for Something’ (1995) 92 Journal of Philosophy pp. 235-260

Extra Reading:

Dean Cocking and Justin Oakley, Virtue Ethics and Professional Roles (Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 2001) Chapter 7 ‘Professional detachment in health care and legal practice’ pp.137-171 ISBN 052179305

Daniel Markovits A Modern Legal Ethics: Adversary Advocacy in a Democratic Age (Princeton, 2008)

Dare on Markovitz

Bradley Wendel (2010) ‘Personal Integrity and the Conflict Between Ordinary and Institutional Values’ Tim Dare and Brad Wendel Eds.  Professional Ethics and Personal Integrity (Cambridge Scholars Press, 2010), pp 238-269

Week 8: September 25, Lecture Tuesday September 26.

  Integrity and Detachment cont.,

Updated distance detachment integrity powerpoint

Week 9: October 1, Lecture Tuesday October 2.

 The Client/Professional Relationship

Powerpoint: The Client/Professional Relationship

Reading

Dare The Client/Professional Relationship

Charles Fried 'The Lawyer as Friend'

 

Week 10: October 8, Lecture Tuesday October 9.

Professional Ethics and Virtue Ethics 1. Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird

Powerpoint

Reading/Watching:  

Tim Dare 'Legal Ethics and To Kill a Mockingbird' Philosophy and Literature 2001

Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird, 1960

To Kill a Mockingbird, Universal Studios, 1962, Directed Robert Mulligan, Starring Gregory Peck

Week 11: October 16, Lecture Tuesday October 17.

Virtue Ethics 1. Professional Ethics and Neo- and Post-NeoAristotelian Virtue Ethicxs

Powerpoint

Reading:  

Practical Virtue Ethics Christine Swanton

 

 

Course summary:

Date Details Due